![]() TELUS: In 2005, Canada’s second-largest telecommunications company, Telus, began blocking access to a server that hosted a website supporting a labor strike against the company. 2007 investigations from the Associated Press, the Electronic Frontier Foundation and others confirmed that Comcast was indeed blocking or slowing file-sharing applications without disclosing this fact to its customers. Users of services like BitTorrent and Gnutella were unable to connect to these services. ![]() The FCC stepped in to sanction Madison River and prevent further blocking, but it lacks the authority to stop this kind of abuse today.ĬOMCAST: In 2007, the nation’s largest ISP, Comcast, began secretly blocking peer-to-peer technologies that its customers were using over its network. Vonage filed a complaint with the FCC after receiving a slew of customer complaints. MADISON RIVER: In 2005, North Carolina ISP Madison River Communications blocked the voice-over-internet protocol (VOIP) service Vonage. Here’s what happens when cable and phone companies are left to their own devices: This history of abuse revealed a problem that the FCC’s 2015 Net Neutrality protections solved. In reality, many providers both in the United States and abroad have violated the principles of Net Neutrality - and they plan to continue doing so in the future. ![]() And if it did, they add, market forces would compel internet service providers to correct course and reopen their networks. The principle that protects free speech and innovation online is irrelevant, they claim, as blocking has never, ever happened. Where Does My Senator Stand on Net Neutralityįor years a lineup of phone- and cable-industry spokespeople has called Net Neutrality “ a solution in search of a problem.”.Where Does My Representative Stand on Net Neutrality.Net Neutrality: What You Need to Know Now.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |